Ki sa ki Net netralite?

Mwen se yon fanatik nan gwo biznis ak mwen pa anpil nan yon teoryan doomsday; sepandan, Net Netralite se gwo pou mwen pèsonèlman. Tout lavi mwen ak kapasite pou sipòte pitit mwen yo depann sou kapasite travay mwen an pou itilize entènèt la, kapasite mwen pou itilize entènèt la ... epi li rapidman vin timoun mwen yo tou. Dicing moute entènèt la ak liy rapid ak dousman pa bay chwa, li pral vrèman jis antere liy yo dousman. Sa vle di ke kapasite nou, kòm blogueurs ak antreprenè ti biznis yo, pral disparèt.

Mwen kwè ke sa pral lakòz nan mwens kwasans ekonomik epi yo pral finalman fè mal ekonomi nou an ak, nan vire, revni taks. Sa a se yon senaryo trè pè epi yo pral chanje balans lan nan richès ak pouvwa ke entènèt la pote nan ti vwa a - epi mete l 'tounen nan men moun ki gen lajan - menm jan li te pase ak jounal, mizik, radyo, ak televizyon.

Ou reyèlman pa ta dwe travay sou ranje bagay sa yo ki pa sèlman yo pa kase ... men yo ap chanje mond lan nou ap viv nan ak ouvèti nouvo ekonomi ak biznis chak dezyèm nan jounen an.

Gen kèk ironik isit la tou. Biznis tankou Akamai deja ede biznis yo 'pi vit' livrezon kontni yo sou nèt la:

Akamai EdgePlatform a gen ladan 20,000 serveurs deplwaye nan 71 peyi ki toujou kontwole entènèt la? trafik, tach pwoblèm ak kondisyon an jeneral. Nou itilize enfòmasyon sa yo pou entèlijans optimize wout ak replike kontni pou livrezon pi vit, pi serye. Kòm Akamai okipe 20% nan total trafik entènèt jodi a, wè nou nan entènèt la se pi konplè a ak dinamik kolekte nenpòt kote.

Dènyèman, nou te kòmanse itilize Akamai nan travay nou an epi li te amelyorasyon doub chif nan repons aplikasyon nou an atravè mond lan ... nan kèk kote jiska 80%. Sa a se, nan kou, teknoloji ki pa abòdab pou ti biznis yo; sepandan, li nan yon biznis nan ak nan tèt li. Se konsa, pa sèlman nou pa bezwen nouvo 'liy rapid' sa yo, nou deja gen solisyon ki ede gwo biznis nan livrezon kontni pi vit. Se konsa, poukisa nou toujou ap pale de sa a?

Siyen petisyon an epi bay li bay Sove entènèt la.

6 Kòmantè

  1. 1
  2. 2

    The folks that own the main thoroughfares of the Internet would like to create two paths for traffic. One path (as it is now) would be a normal internet routing. Another path; however, could be a path where the telecoms could charge for faster, better bandwidth for paying customers.

    The idea behind it is that legitimate businesses could pay for improved delivery of their content to you or me. This way they don’t have to worry about getting traffic through existing traffic. If you hit Google for instance, and they are paying for the increased bandwidth, their website would be able to load much faster.

    On paper, it sounds great. However, the result would most likely be catastrophic. There would be no incentive for these companies to improve the overall performance and infrastructure of the Internet for you and me. In fact, quite the opposite would be true. If they let the ‘normal’ pathways of the Internet drop in performance, it would attract more business for the ‘business’ pathways.

    Currently, if Verizon or AT&T or Comcast improves their network and bandwidth, tout moun sees the improvement. That’s the ‘neutral’ in Net Neutrality. Folks like me would like to keep it that way. If these guys build a faster, better network that you have to pay into, you and I will be out of business. People won’t bother coming to our sites because it will simply be too slow.

    At the root of my concern is that, although, these companies are investing heavily in the Internet – they did not create it. It was U.S. taxpayer money that got the Internet off the ground… we shouldn’t be left behind!

  3. 3

    Is this specific to the US or something all over. But, I guess since most of us non-US citizens have sites hosted in the US, it effects us a great deal.

    Going to blog about it. Thanks 🙂

    • 4

      It could happen anywhere, but if it happens in the U.S., the effects would definitely ripple well beyond. Other countries’ big businesses would most likely climb on the bandwagon as well, since that would be the infrastructure that would support reaching the most people. L’il ol’ folks like you and me would be forced to fork up some money or get left in the dirt.

  4. 5
  5. 6

Ki sa ou panse?

Sit sa a sèvi ak Akismet diminye Spam. Aprann kijan kòmantè ou a trete.